Memorandum of Understanding is signed by ARIPO and EUIPO

The African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) has signed a deal (October 3rd) with the recently renamed European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to foster bilateral cooperation for matters related to trademarks, designs and enforcement thereof. Notably, EUIPO does not support patent applications through its Offices.

This Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) renews the previous 1999 and 2011 agreements and create opportunities for joint conferences, seminars, training programs to share expertise in IP matters and comparative IP studies.

Cambodia becomes member of PCT

On September 8th 2016, WIPO Director General Francis Gurry received the instruments of accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) from Cambodia’s Senior Minister and Minister of Industry and Handicraft, Cham Prasidh.

Cambodia’s accession brings the number of PCT members to 151.

PCT considerably facilitates international protection of inventions helping applicants to seek patent applications internationally for their inventions, providing a cost effective system.

New developments in the Cayman Islands Intellectual Property Legal Framework

The Cayman Islands had an outdated IP legislation in force, but waves of change are in progress. With the new Cayman Islands Intellectual Property Office (CIIPO), the Cayman Islands Government fully intends to revolutionize the organization and application of new Intellectual Property laws.

Louis Vuitton vs My Other Bag (MOB)

Louis Vuitton, the world’s most valuable fashion house based in Paris, filed an infringement lawsuit, back in June 2014, against My Other Bag (MOB), a small company based in Los Angeles, United States, claiming among others, that MOB is infringing on their registered trademarks and designs, but also diluting its famous trademark.

Louis Vuitton also claims that MOB completely ignored the several requests to cease production and marketing of their bags that infringed on Louis Vuitton’s designs.

SAUDI ARABIA: Increase in official fees

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Trademark Law has the primary objective of unifying the trademark registration systems and procedure of all member states of the GCC: Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman and United Arab Emirates. This unification, however, does not create a centralized filing procedure nor does it replace the national filing.

Approved by the GCC Supreme Council during its 33th meeting, back in 2012, it has been progressively adapted and implemented by the GCC member states, only now coming into force in Saudi Arabia.

Mexico: trademark opposition system comes into force

Past August 30, 2016, a trademark opposition system has come into effect in Mexico. The amendment to the Mexican IP Law was published in the Official Gazette June 1, 2016 and a new opposition has come alive, where before there was none. While the opposition system is most certainly welcome, taking into account that it will make it easier – and cheaper – for opponents to oppose published trademarks that might be deemed too similar to their previous trademarks, the new opposition system has some local peculiarities that might make it a strange beast for most foreign applicants.

Thailand: Changes to the Trademark Act

Aiming at making the protection of intellectual property a more efficient process, Thailand has amended its Trademarks Act of B.E. 2534 (1991).

The amendments were published in the Royal Gazette on April 29, 2016 and become effective on July 28, 90 days after the publication date.

Significant changes were introduced which we may summarize as follows.

Djibouti integrates the Patent Cooperation Treaty

Abstract: Djibouti becomes the 150th PCT Member-state

Djibouti has become the 150th Member State to join the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), it filed its instrument of accession on the 23rd of June, 2016 and the treaty is expected to be enforceable from the 23rd of September, 2016. The law in Djibouti is due to be amended in order to cater for PCT international applications.

The IP Challenges caused by BREXIT

Abstract: The UK has voted to leave the EU – what are the consequences for IP Rights?

The surprise came on the morning of Friday, the 24th of June: Voters in the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union. Apart from all of the other economic and political issues, this event has created a chorus of concerns among IP stakeholders.